Processors comparison
Core Ultra 7 265F vs Core Ultra 7 265K
Specs, platform, power, size and UK prices side by side. Every value comes from the product listing; anything we don't hold is marked unknown.
Key differences
- Both use the LGA 1851 socket. Check a motherboard's CPU support list before swapping one for the other; older boards can need a BIOS update.
- The Core Ultra 7 265K boosts to 5.5 GHz, 0.2 GHz higher than the Core Ultra 7 265F.
- The Core Ultra 7 265F is rated at 65 W TDP against 250 W, so it is easier to cool and puts less load on the power supply.
- The Core Ultra 7 265K has integrated graphics; the Core Ultra 7 265F needs a graphics card to show a picture.
Performance
We don't have measured benchmark results for these parts yet, and we don't publish estimated scores. Specs like core count, clock speed and video memory are a guide, not a measure of speed in games or apps.
Specifications
| Specification | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core Ultra 7 265K |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | ||
| SocketDecides which motherboards the processor fits. | LGA 1851 | LGA 1851 |
| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake | Arrow Lake |
| Series | Intel Core Ultra 7 | Intel Core Ultra 7 |
| Cores and clocks | ||
| Cores | 20 | 20 |
| Threads | 20 | 20 |
| Max boost clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.5 GHzHigher |
| Power and cooling | ||
| Rated TDPThe maker's thermal design rating, not measured power draw. | 65 W | 250 W |
| Cooler in the box | Unknown | No |
| Features | ||
| Integrated graphicsWithout it you need a graphics card to get a picture. | No | Yes |
More comparisons
Compare the Core Ultra 7 265F with
Compare the Core Ultra 7 265K with
Prices are the lowest listed new price from retailers we track, checked on the date shown, and can change. We may earn a commission from retailer links. How it works