Processors comparison
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs Core i9-14900F
Specs, platform, power, size and UK prices side by side. Every value comes from the product listing; anything we don't hold is marked unknown.
Key differences
- Different platforms: the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses sTR5 and the Core i9-14900F uses LGA 1700, so they need different motherboards.
- The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X has 24 cores / 48 threads; the Core i9-14900F has 24 cores / 32 threads.
- The Core i9-14900F is rated at 65 W TDP against 350 W, so it is easier to cool and puts less load on the power supply.
- The Core i9-14900F comes with a cooler in the box; budget for a separate cooler with the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X.
- Memory support differs: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X DDR5, Core i9-14900F DDR4, DDR5.
- The Core i9-14900F is £805.00 cheaper at its lowest listed new price (£520.47 against £1325.47).
Performance
We don't have measured benchmark results for these parts yet, and we don't publish estimated scores. Specs like core count, clock speed and video memory are a guide, not a measure of speed in games or apps.
Specifications
| Specification | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | ||
| SocketDecides which motherboards the processor fits. | sTR5 | LGA 1700 |
| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Architecture | Unknown | Raptor Lake Refresh |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | Intel Core i9 |
| Cores and clocks | ||
| Cores | 24 | 24 |
| Threads | 48Higher | 32 |
| Max boost clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Power and cooling | ||
| Rated TDPThe maker's thermal design rating, not measured power draw. | 350 W | 65 W |
| Cooler in the box | No | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Integrated graphicsWithout it you need a graphics card to get a picture. | No | No |
More comparisons
Compare the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X with
Prices are the lowest listed new price from retailers we track, checked on the date shown, and can change. We may earn a commission from retailer links. How it works